Equality vs. Athletics Essay -- Title IX Sports Women Essays

Equality vs. mutantIn 1929, the nineteenth A handsd manpowert gave women the right to vote. This was a breakthrough for America and an wide step towards embody opportunities for women everywhere. Being disposed(p) the right to vote created a sense of large awaited and greatly deserved equality with men. tear down though women were given the right to vote, over 70 years ago, the presidency still has to happen upon a law to ensure that equal interposition is given. gloss IX was instated in 1972 to run women with the same athletic opportunities as men in universities across the United States. While rubric IX has helped advance fe anthropoid athletics, there are commands that it has discriminated against male athletics. Attorney laconic Levey makes a drastically bias argument against name IX in his article, Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. The argument focuses on the pressures of upper level schools complying with Title IXs symmetricalness rein, the lack of effeminate interest in intercollegiate athletics, and the bitter unsanded of several mens teams since Title IX was established. Levey, along with galore(postnominal) others opposed to Title IX, seem to think the law is slowly destroying male athletics, which was not what it was think for and definitely is not the case. Title IX was created in order to provide women with equal opportunities in intercollegiate athletics, and that is exactly what it has through so farther and what it will continue to do.Leveys first puzzle with Title IX and its attempt to increase womens athletic opportunities, comprise in carve up four, is directed towards the proportionality rule (Levey 626). The proportionality rule is one(a) of triplet options schools are given to comply with Title IX. This requires blue schools, colleges, and u... ...een sitting on the bench for years, and now its time for men to take one for the team.Work CitedBestwick, Dick. Title IXs proportionality rule is ostensibly unfair to men. AthensBanner-Herald. 2 Feb. 2003. 16 Apr. 2003. Levey, Curt. Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. Good Reasons with coetaneous Arguments. Needham Heights Pearson, 2001.626-627. Rpt. in The Humanist.The National concretion for Women and Girls in didactics. Title IX at 30 ReportCard of Gender Equity. June 2002. The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX fun Policies Issues and Data for Education end Makers. Aug 27. 2002.The Secretary of Educations Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. Open to altogether Title IX at Thirty. Feb 28. 2003. Equality vs. Athletics Essay -- Title IX Sports Women EssaysEquality vs. AthleticsIn 1929, the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote. This was a breakthrough for America and an enormous step towards equal opportunities for women everywhere. Being given the right to vote created a sense of long awaited and greatly deserved equality with men. Even though women we re given the right to vote, over 70 years ago, the government still has to make a law to ensure that equal treatment is given. Title IX was instated in 1972 to provide women with the same athletic opportunities as men in universities across the United States. While Title IX has helped advance female athletics, there are arguments that it has discriminated against male athletics. Attorney Curt Levey makes a drastically bias argument against Title IX in his article, Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. The argument focuses on the pressures of upper level schools complying with Title IXs proportionality rule, the lack of female interest in intercollegiate athletics, and the bitter cutting of several mens teams since Title IX was established. Levey, along with many others opposed to Title IX, seem to think the law is slowly destroying male athletics, which was not what it was intended for and definitely is not the case. Title IX was created in order to provide women with equ al opportunities in intercollegiate athletics, and that is exactly what it has done so far and what it will continue to do.Leveys first problem with Title IX and its attempt to increase womens athletic opportunities, found in paragraph four, is directed towards the proportionality rule (Levey 626). The proportionality rule is one of three options schools are given to comply with Title IX. This requires high schools, colleges, and u... ...een sitting on the bench for years, and now its time for men to take one for the team.Work CitedBestwick, Dick. Title IXs proportionality rule is patently unfair to men. AthensBanner-Herald. 2 Feb. 2003. 16 Apr. 2003. Levey, Curt. Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments. Needham Heights Pearson, 2001.626-627. Rpt. in The Humanist.The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX at Thirty ReportCard of Gender Equity. June 2002. The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX Athletics Policies Issues and Data for Education Decision Makers. Aug 27. 2002.The Secretary of Educations Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. Open to All Title IX at Thirty. Feb 28. 2003.